Dunn v. City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina et al
Plaintiff: Keith Otis Dunn
Defendant: City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina, Donald Mosley and Rocky Mount Police Department
Case Number: 4:2010cv00028
Filed: March 11, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Eastern Division Office
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER denying 55 Motion to Strike and adopting 61 Memorandum and Recommendations - Any future filings on behalf of plaintiff will be stricken unless filed in compliance with Local Civil Rule 83.1(d). Any future filings by Mr. Nowak will be st ricken unless he files a notice of appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2. Brian K. McDaniel is ORDERED to alert the court to the status of his representation and file the appropriate motion to withdraw within five days of entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/3/2012. (Baker, C.)
August 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/17/2011. (Baker, C.)
June 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered June 16, 2011, that defendant Moseley is entitled to qualified immunity and public officer's immunity, the City defendant is entitled to governmenta l immunity and that plaintiff has failed to put forward evidence substantiating his § 1983 or intentional tort claims. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court on 06/20/2011. (Baker, C.)
June 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/15/2011. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dunn v. City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Otis Dunn
Represented By: Thomas Franklin Loflin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rocky Mount Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?