Webb-Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
| Charlotte K. Webb-Smith |
| Internal Revenue Service |
| 4:2013cv00005 |
| January 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Eastern Division Office |
| HALIFAX |
| W. Earl Britt |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING 27 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. A jury trial is currently set for 9/29/2014. Signed by Senior U.S. Judge W. Earl Britt on 9/2/2014. (Fisher, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Webb-Smith v. Internal Revenue Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charlotte K. Webb-Smith | |
| Represented By: | Katie A. Lawson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
