Goodwin v. Cockrell et al
Plaintiff: Sherman D. Goodwin
Defendant: Antoinette Magee Cockrell and Judy I. Sullivan
Case Number: 4:2013cv00199
Filed: August 27, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: CARTERET
Presiding Judge: James C. Fox
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1292
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 150 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it hereby is ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Sherman Goodwin has demonstrated that Arthur Cockrell was negligent by violating the Inland Rules of Naviga tion when operating the TONI SEA. Judgment therefore is for Plaintiff Sherman Goodwin in the amount of $151,152.78, with prejudgment interest to be assessed on his past damages, which damages amount to $80,652.78 from the date of his injur y, September 4, 2010, until the date of the original order entered on October 14, 2015 [DE-141], and post-judgment interest on the total award from the date of the order entered on October 14, 2015 [DE-141], until the judgment is satisfied in amount in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED for the reasons stated in the court's order dated October 14, 2015 at [DE-141], Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay Defendants attorney's fees in the amount of $4,360.00. Signed by Susan Edwards, Deputy for Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 12/30/2015. (Edwards, S.)
October 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 142 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it hereby is ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Sherman Goodwin has demonstrated that Arthur Cockrell was negligent by violating the Inland Rules of Naviga tion when operating the TONI SEA. Judgment therefore is for Plaintiff Sherman Goodwin in the amount of $151,152.78, with prejudgment interest on his past damages in the amount of $80,652.78 from the date of his injury, September 4, 2010, un til the date of this order and post-judgment interest on the total award from the date of this order until the judgment is satisfied in amount in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED for the reasons stated in the court's order dated 10/14/2015 at [DE-141], Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay Defendants attorney's fees in the amount of $4,360.00. Signed by Susan K. Edwards, Deputy for Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 10/14/2015. (Edwards, S.)
February 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER GRANTING IN PART 91 Motion to Strike; GRANTING 93 Motion to Amend; GRANTING 96 Motion to Strike; DENYING 102 Motion for Costs Associated with the Continuation of the Trial; GRANTING 107 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 2/11/2015. (Edwards, S.)
November 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER denying 46 Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Ann T. Neulicht, Ph.D.; denying 49 Motion in Limine and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion in Limine to Exclude Portions of the Testimony of Captain Donald Davis; g ranting 50 Motion in Limine and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion in Limine to Admit the Written Statement of and Diagram by Arthur E. Cockrell; denying 57 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Collateral Source Payments; d enying 60 Motion in Limine to Preclude the Introduction into Evidence of Any Portion of the USCG Report of Investigation, Portions of Report of Defendants' Expert Capt. Murphy and to Limit the Testimony of Capt. Murphy; granting 63 Motion for Reconsideration regarding 59 Order on Motion to Quash, Motion for Use of Dr. Guirgues' deposition at trial; granting 80 Motion to Amend 66 Pretrial order; denying 84 Motion in Limine and Memorandum of Law in Support to E xclude Evidence of Lost Future Wages and Lost Earning Capacity; and, granting 97 Motion to Continue and Memorandum - The recommencement of this trial is continued to the court's February 17, 2015 term of court. Counsel should read attached order for critical information. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 11/21/2014. (Tripp, S.)
October 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting 45 Motion to Quash. The court orders that the notice of deposition is quashed. The court declines, however, to award Defendants any fees or expenses associated with filing the motion to quash. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 10/16/2014. (Grady, B.)
October 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER denying 33 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to continue the management of this case. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 10/6/2014. (Grady, B.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodwin v. Cockrell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherman D. Goodwin
Represented By: Stevenson L. Weeks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antoinette Magee Cockrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judy I. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?