Dyson et al v. Le'Chris Health System Incorporated et al
| Annie Battle Dyson and Aaron Purnell Dyson |
| Edgecombe County Government and Le'Chris Health System Incorporated |
| 4:2013cv00224 |
| December 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Eastern Division Office |
| EDGECOMBE |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER GRANTING 43 Le'Chris' Motion for Summary Judgment, and GRANTING 45 Edgecombe County Government's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 1/8/2015. Copy mailed to the pro se plaintiffs, via US Mail, to 1612 King Circle, Rocky Mount, NC, 27801. (Fisher, M.)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER DENYING 35 Plaintiffs' Motion to Supress. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/9/2014. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiffs, via US mail, to 1612 King Circle, Rocky Mount, NC, 27801. (Fisher, M.)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 8 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed in part and allowed to proceed in part. Defendants Leonard Wiggins and Lorenzo Carmon are dismissed from the case. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 1/23/2014. Counsel is directed to read the order in its entirety for critical information about what claims have been dismissed and what claims are allowed to proceed. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiffs via US Mail. (Fisher, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
