Moore v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Carrie V. Moore
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2013cv00254
Filed: December 12, 2013
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: MARTIN
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 11, 2015 37 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 35 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/11/2015. (Baker, C.)
February 24, 2015 33 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 30 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting 32 Memorandum and Recommendation; and granting 24 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/23/2015. (Castania, M.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carrie V. Moore
Represented By: Kathleen S. Glancy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?