Underwood et al v. SSC Clayton Operating Company LLC et al
| Fran M. Underwood and Danny C. Underwood |
| SSC Clayton Operating Company LLC, SSC Submaster Holdings, LLC, SSC Equity Holdings, LLC, North Carolina Holdco, LLC, SavaSeniorCare, LLC, SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services, LLC and SavaSeniorCare Consulting, LLC |
| 4:2014cv00217 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Eastern Division Office |
| JOHNSTON |
| James C. Fox |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
Order Dismissing Case without prejudice to any party to move to reopenshould settlement not be consummated on or before August 1, 2016. Unless the case is reopened, counsel are DIRECTED to file their Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before August 1, 2016. Counsel should read the order in its entirety. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 7/7/2016. (Edwards, S.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Seal 22 Proposed Sealed Document. The court also finds that Plaintiffs have shown good cause for their counsel's failure to comply with the court's April 24, 2015, Order [DE-15]. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to continue the management of this case. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 6/4/2015. (Grady, B.)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Senior Judge W. Earl Britt recused. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 11/25/2014. (Marsh, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
