K.B., et al. v. Edgecome County Public School Board of Education, et al.
K.B. and L.B. |
Edgecome County Public School Board of Education, John Farrelly, Marc Whichard, Craig Harris, Billy Strother, Alaina Ritter, Alyssa Parrish-Stafford, Dara Harmon, Miles Stafford and Rebecca Sugg |
4:2016cv00271 |
November 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Eastern Division Office |
EDGECOMBE |
James C. Dever |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 219 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 119 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 121 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 122 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 126 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. In due course, the court will issue an order expounding on these conclusions. After the court issues the order, the parties shall participate in a court-hosted mediation with a United States Magistrate Judge. If the case does not settle, the court will hold a status conference to discuss and schedule the trial. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 3/31/2020. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 218 ORDER denying 133 Motion to Seal Document; denying 135 Motion to Seal Document; denying 141 Motion to Seal; denying 143 Motion to Seal; denying 153 Motion to Seal; denying 168 Motion to Seal; denying 170 Motion to Seal; denying [ 172] Motion to Seal; denying 180 Motion to Seal; denying 185 Motion to Seal; denying 190 Motion to Seal Document; denying 192 Motion to Seal; denying 198 Motion to Seal; denying 200 Motion to Seal. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 2/10/2020. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 217 ORDER denying 147 Motion to Strike. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 2/6/2020. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 94 ORDER - The court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Board's motion to dismiss [D.E. 67]. Plaintiffs' Title IX claims against the Board and K.B.'s claim against the Board under the North Carolina Whistleblower Act survive. The court DISMISSES the other claims against the Board. The court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Farrelly's motion to dismiss [D.E. 69]. Plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Farrelly and K.B.'s claim against Farrelly under the No rth Carolina Whistleblower Act survive. The court DISMISSES all other claims against Farrelly. The court also DISMISSES the Title IX claims against Whichard, Harris, Strother, and Sugg. The court GRANTS Castillo's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for improper service and process [D.E. 84], and DENIES plaintiffs' motion to allow service after the deadline [D.E. 87]. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 9/18/2018. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 62 ORDER denying as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying as moot 39 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 39 Motion to Dismis s for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying as moot 45 Motion to Dismiss; granting 55 Motion for Leave to File. The amended complaint is due no later than August 18, 2017. Defendants may plead in response to the amendedcomplaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15( a)(3). Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/14/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.