Smith v. Parker, et al
| Jasman J. Smith |
| Terri L. Parker, Town of Winterville and Winterville Town Council |
| 4:2017cv00013 |
| January 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Eastern Division Office |
| PITT |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
AMENDED JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered November 15, 2019, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted, plaintiff's mo tion for summary judgment is denied, and plaintiff's motion to seal is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered November 19, 2019, that plaintiff is DIRECTED to pay defendant costs an d expenses in the amount of $518.00 and attorneys' fees in the amount of $2,399.85, for a total award of $2,917.85, within 30 days of the date of the order entered November 19, 2019. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/19/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
94
JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered November 15, 2019, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied, and plaintiff's motion to seal is granted. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/15/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion for Sanctions. The court ORDERS plaintiff to pay attorneys fees, costs, and expenses incurred by defendant related to defendant's motion to compel discovery and plai ntiff's October 11, 2018 deposition. Defendants are DIRECTED to file within seven days from the date of this order a declaration of costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred. Plaintiff shall have 14 days to respond. The court ORDERS the discovery and dispositive motions deadline to be extended to allow defendant time to conduct sufficient discovery in this matter. Accordingly, the parties have up to and including January 28, 2019 to complete plaintiff's deposition and to allow plaintiff to submit complete discovery responses. Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than February 27, 2019. The parties are afforded 14 days from the issuance of this order to show good cause if any exists to modify these court-ordered deadlines. The court LIFTS the stay of this case. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/2/2019. (A certified copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Jasman J. Smith, P. O. Box 401, Greenville, NC 27835.) (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER - The court GRANTS defendants' partial motion to dismiss [DE15], dismissing the following claims: 1) Claims based on violations of the ADA; 2) Claims based on discrimination due to pregnancy; 3) Claims for failure to promote; 4) Claims brought pursuant to § 1983; 5) Claims against defendant Parker; and 6) Claims against defendant Council. Such claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, purs uant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Claims not subject to the motion to dismiss, asserted against defendant Winterville, for race-based discrimination based on disparate treatment, wrongful discharge, and retaliation in violation of Title VII remain. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/5/2017. (Collins, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
