White Lightning Sportfisherman, Inc. v. M/V Susie-Q, et al
| White Lighting Sportfisherman, Inc. |
| M/V SUSIE-Q, Timothy S Rhodes and Suzanne W Rhodes |
| 4:2018cv00077 |
| April 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Eastern Division Office |
| BEAUFORT |
| James C. Dever |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER - On October 4, 2018, the court held a hearing on defendants' motion to abstain and renewed motion for hearing to fix the quantum of Rule E Special Bond. After hearing oral argument and considering the record, the court denied defendants' motion to abstain [D.E. 16] and set the quantum for the bond at $386,835.27. See Supplemental Rule E(S)(a). Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 10/4/2018. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Hearing to Fix the Quantum of Rule E Special Bond and Motion to Stay. The Court will hold a hearing to determine the Quantum of the Rule E Special Bond at 3:00 pm, October 4, 2018. In addition, this case is hereby STAYED pending resolution of Defendants' motions to Fix the Quantum of the Rule E Special Bond. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/31/2018. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Allow Joint Survey. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 5/22/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting 6 Motion for Appointment of Substitute Custodian. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 4/26/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
