Sound Rivers, Inc. et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
| Sound Rivers, Inc. and Center for Biological Diversity |
| United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Greg Sheehan |
| 4:2018cv00097 |
| May 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Eastern Division Office |
| BEAUFORT |
| James C. Dever |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER denying 52 Motion Clarification regarding 51 Order on Motion to Remand to Agency. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 6/18/2019. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 50 Motion to Remand to Federal Highway Administration for Endangered Species Act consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. All pending deadlines are hereby stayed pending completion of ESA consultation. FHWA shall file a status report four months from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 4/10/2019. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 38 Motion for Reconsideration of Scheduling order and for Alternative Scheduling Order. The "Scheduling Order" dated October 27, 2018 (ECF No. 34) is hereby VACATED. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 12/17/2018. (Sellers, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
