Sessoms-Strange v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Grizelle Sessoms-Strange
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Case Number: 4:2018cv00146
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: EDGECOMBE
Presiding Judge: James C Dever
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2018 Filing 10 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice on 8/28/2018. (Sellers, N.)
August 29, 2018 Filing 9 Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service as to Nancy A. Berryhill served on 8/28/2018, answer due 10/27/2018. (Sellers, N.)
August 28, 2018 Filing 8 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security on 8/24/2018. (Sellers, N.)
August 21, 2018 Filing 7 Summonses Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Sellers, N.)
August 21, 2018 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Grizelle Sessoms-Strange. (Sellers, N.)
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/21/2018. (Sellers, N.)
August 21, 2018 Remark: Certified copy of #5 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Sellers, N.)
August 20, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Karl E. Osterhout on behalf of Grizelle Sessoms-Strange. (Osterhout, Karl)
August 20, 2018 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Grizelle Sessoms-Strange (Eaglin, Paul)
August 20, 2018 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Paul B. Eaglin on behalf of Grizelle Sessoms-Strange. (Eaglin, Paul)
August 20, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Grizelle Sessoms-Strange. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Supplement usm 285, #7 Supplement usm 285, #8 Supplement usm 285) (Eaglin, Paul)
August 20, 2018 Motion Submitted to Chief Judge James C. Dever III regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Sellers, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sessoms-Strange v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grizelle Sessoms-Strange
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Represented By: Paul B. Eaglin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSAOGC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?