Trawler Carolina Lady, Inc. v. Ross et al
| Trawler Carolina Lady, Inc. |
| Wilbur Ross, Chris Oliver, Michael Pentony and David Gouveia |
| 4:2019cv00019 |
| January 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to David Gouveia, Chris Oliver, Michael Pentony, Wilbur Ross, US Attorney and Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*). (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Trawler Carolina Lady, Inc. (Weeks, Stevenson) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Stevenson L. Weeks on behalf of Trawler Carolina Lady, Inc.. (Weeks, Stevenson) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Gouveia, Chris Oliver, Michael Pentony, Wilbur Ross ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-4812601.), filed by Trawler Carolina Lady, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to Michael Pentony, #3 Proposed Summons to Wilbur Ross, #4 Proposed Summons to Chris Oliver, #5 Proposed Summons to Matthew Whitaker, #6 Proposed Summons to Robert Higdon, #7 Proposed Summons to David Gouveia) (Weeks, Stevenson) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
