Taylor v. Saul
Plaintiff: George Leonard Taylor
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 4:2019cv00066
Filed: May 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Process Receipt and Return served on Andy Liu, General Counsel of SSA on 5/17/19. (Collins, S.)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Process Receipt and Return served on US Attorney General on 5/20/19. (Collins, S.)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed on US Attorney as to Nancy A. Berryhill served on 5/17/2019, answer due 7/16/2019. (Collins, S.)
May 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Collins, S.)
May 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill filed by George Leonard Taylor. (Collins, S.)
May 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue the summonses prepared by plaintiff (filed at D.E. 1-3, 1-4, 1-5). The U.S. Marshal is DIRECTED to serve defendant by delivering each summons to the addressee listed in the summons along with a copy of the complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 5/6/2019. (Collins, S.)
May 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Remark - Certified copy of Order #4 and file-stamped copies of summonses, complaint, notice of appearance and financial disclosure statements forwarded to U.S. Marshal, along with USM-285 forms. (Collins, S.)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by GEORGE LEONARD TAYLOR (Clauson, Vaughn)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Vaughn Stephen Clauson on behalf of GEORGE LEONARD TAYLOR. (Clauson, Vaughn)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by GEORGE LEONARD TAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons 285-Summ US Att'y, #4 Proposed Summons 285-Summ AG-USA, #5 Proposed Summons 285-Summ OGC-SSA) (Clauson, Vaughn)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge James E. Gates regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperi. (Collins, S.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Leonard Taylor
Represented By: Vaughn Stephen Clauson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?