Brimmer v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Beatrice L Brimmer |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
4:2019cv00141 |
October 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Order Redesignating Division to Southern Division - This case is redesignated as a Southern Division case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, Chief United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 7:19-CV-196-BO. No further filing shall be made in 4:19-CV-141-BO. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/4/2019. (Stouch, L.) |
Intradistrict Transfer to Southern Division. New case number: 7:19-cv-196-BO. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 3 Corrected COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 26KL0P8A.), filed by Beatrice L Brimmer. (King, Leah) Modified on 10/7/2019 to reflect that the corrected complaint has been refiled. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Leah Lassiter King on behalf of Beatrice L Brimmer. (King, Leah) |
Filing 1 REFILED AT DE #3 COMPLAINT Federal Tort Claim against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5131022.), filed by Beatrice L Brimmer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (King, Leah) Modified on 10/7/2019 to reflect that the complaint was refiled at DE #3 . (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel: This case should have been filed in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. Filing is not text searchable. Local Civil Rule 5.1 requires that all documents submitted for filing be in a text searchable format. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Beatrice L Brimmer. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 10.1(c), except for the initial filing, all pleadings, motions, discovery procedures, notices, memoranda and other papers filed with the clerk of court shall bear the case number assigned by the clerk. No action required at this time. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brimmer v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Beatrice L Brimmer | |
Represented By: | Leah Lassiter King |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.