Skyline Restoration, Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance Company
Skyline Restoration, Inc. |
Church Mutual Insurance Company |
4:2019cv00167 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order Redesignating Division to Southern Division. This case is redesignated as a Southern Division case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, Chief United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 7:19-CV-232-BO. No further filing shall be made in 4:19-CV-67-BO. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/25/2019. (Stouch, L.) |
Intradistrict Transfer to Southern Division. New case number: 7:19-cv-232-BO. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by David S. Coats on behalf of Skyline Restoration, Inc.. (Coats, David) (Main Document 5 flattened and replaced on 11/25/2019) (Edwards, S.). |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by David S. Coats on behalf of Skyline Restoration, Inc.. (Coats, David) (Main Document 4 flattened and replaced on 11/25/2019) (Edwards, S.). |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by David S. Coats on behalf of Skyline Restoration, Inc. (Coats, David) (Main Document 3 flattened and replaced on 11/25/2019) (Edwards, S.). |
Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Skyline Restoration, Inc. (Coats, David) (Main Document 2 flattened and replaced on 11/25/2019) (Edwards, S.). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Church Mutual Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5196628.), filed by Skyline Restoration, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Coats, David) (Attachment 1 and 2 flattened and replaced on 11/25/2019) (Edwards, S.). |
Notice to Counsel regarding: [1-1] Civil Cover Sheet, [1-2] Proposed Summons, #2 Financial Disclosure Statement, #3 Notice of Appearance, #4 Notice of Appearance, #5 Notice of Appearance. Counsel is reminded that the court prefers flattened pdf fillable forms. Counsel should "flatten" the civil cover sheet, proposed summons, financial disclosure statement and notices of appearance prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed at this time. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - This case should have been opened in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - Each attorney shall file their notice of attorney appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.1. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Skyline Restoration, Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Church Mutual Insurance Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Skyline Restoration, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David S. Coats |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.