Worsham v. Saul
Joseph Allen Worsham |
Andrew M. Saul |
4:2020cv00086 |
May 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Affidavit of Service for US Marshals 285 Form - Summons and Complaint served on U.S. Attorney on 7/7/2020. (Waddell, K.) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 US Marshal 285 Forms) (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Joseph Allen Worsham. (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue the summonses prepared by Plaintiff. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summonses and a copy of the complaint on Defendant. Signed by United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 5/25/2020. (Edwards, S.) |
Remark - Copy of the #4 Order and file stamped copies of the complaint, summonses, financial disclosure statement and notice of appearance forwarded to the US Marshal for service, along with USM-285 forms. (Edwards, S.) (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 4 Order Redesignating Division to Eastern Division. The Honorable Richard E. Myers II, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 4:20-CV-86-M. No further filing shall be made in 2:20-CV-28-M. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/22/2020. (Edwards, S.) |
Case transferred in from Northern Division on 05/22/2020. Previous case number was 2:20-cv-28-M. (Edwards, S.) |
Motion Referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . (Edwards, S.) |
Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Eastern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Joseph Allen Worsham (Vincent, Branch) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Branch W. Vincent, III on behalf of Joseph Allen Worsham. (Vincent, Branch) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Joseph Allen Worsham. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Proposed Summons Atty General, #5 Proposed Summons Gen Counsel, #6 Proposed Summons US Atty EDNC, #7 Exhibit Receipt US Atty General, #8 Exhibit Receipt Gen Counsel, #9 Exhibit Receipt US Atty EDNC) (Vincent, Branch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Worsham v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joseph Allen Worsham | |
Represented By: | Branch W. Vincent, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.