First Protective Insurance Company v. Rike
First Protective Insurance Company |
Linda Rike |
4:2020cv00124 |
June 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Memorandum in Support regarding #11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Linda Rike. (Jessup, Robert) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Linda Rike. (Jessup, Robert) |
Filing 10 ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/29/2020. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #8 Answer to Complaint,, Counterclaim, by First Protective Insurance Company. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against First Protective Insurance Company by Linda Rike. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit APA Letter, #2 Exhibit Ins. Co. Appraisal Demand Letter, #3 Exhibit Ins. Co. Estimate, #4 Exhibit Appraisal Award, #5 Exhibit Ins. Co. Refusal to Pay Letter) (Jessup, Robert) |
Filing 7 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by First Protective Insurance Company. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Robert Henry Jessup, IV on behalf of Linda Rike. (Jessup, Robert) |
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Linda Rike. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Stephen Kyle Pytlik on behalf of First Protective Insurance Company. (Pytlik, Stephen) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Jeffrey D. Keister on behalf of First Protective Insurance Company. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by First Protective Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent PWC Financial, Inc. for First Protective Insurance Company. (Pytlik, Stephen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Linda Rike ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5480520.), filed by First Protective Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Policy, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons (Rike)) (Pytlik, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: First Protective Insurance Company v. Rike | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Linda Rike | |
Represented By: | Robert Henry Jessup, IV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: First Protective Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Stephen Kyle Pytlik |
Represented By: | Jeffrey D. Keister |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.