Cherry v. Saul
| Levon Cherry |
| Andrew Saul |
| 4:2020cv00132 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Richard E Myers |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
USM 285 Form and USPS Return Receipt - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on US Attorney General on 7/24/2020. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing 8
USM 285 Forms - Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service as to Andrew Saul served on 7/28/2020, answer due 9/26/2020. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing 7
USM 285 Form and USPS Return Receipt - Andrew Saul served with summons and complaint on 7/27/2020. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing 5
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Levon Cherry. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint and issue the Summonses prepared by Plaintiff. The United States Marshal shall serve the Summons and Complaint on the Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 7/1/2020. (Waddell, K.) (Main Document 4 replaced on 7/1/2020 to correct attachment.) (Edwards, S.).
|
|
Remark - Certified copy of #4 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Notice to Counsel regarding: #2 Notice of Appearance and #3 Financial Disclosure Statement. In future filings, the case number should read 4:20-CV-132-M. No action by counsel required at this time. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
Motion Referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Waddell, K.)
|
|
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. At the direction of the Court, this case is reassigned to Chief United States District Judge Terrence W. Boyle for all further proceedings. United States District Judge Richard E. Myers II is no longer assigned to the case. All future filings shall reflect the revised case number of 4:20-CV-132-BO. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/1/2020. (Hockaday, A.)
|
|
Filing 3
Financial Disclosure Statement by Levon Cherry (Arrowood, Derrick)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Appearance filed by Derrick Kyle Arrowood on behalf of Levon Cherry. (Arrowood, Derrick)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Levon Cherry. (Attachments: #1 US Marshal Form, #2 Complaint, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Arrowood, Derrick)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cherry v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Levon Cherry | |
| Represented By: | Derrick Kyle Arrowood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
