Bailey v. Saul
| Karen Bailey |
| Andrew Saul |
| 4:2020cv00152 |
| August 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER adopting #5 Memorandum and Recommendation and denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to tender the $400 filing and administrative fee to the clerk. Signed by District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 9/2/2020. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Motion Submitted to District Judge Richard E. Myers, II regarding #4 Corrected MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis corrected document orientation and #5 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #4 Corrected MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis corrected document orientation filed by Karen Bailey. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #4 Corrected MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of this Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R) on each party who has appeared in this action. Any party may file a written objection to the M&R within 14 days from the date the Clerk serves it on them. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 8/12/2020. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 4 Corrected MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis corrected document orientation filed by Karen Bailey. (Lauffer, Daniel) |
| Motion Referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . (Waddell, K.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - The document image is askew or upside down. Counsel is directed to refile. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Karen Bailey (Lauffer, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Daniel R. Lauffer on behalf of Karen Bailey. (Lauffer, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Karen Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons to Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, #4 Summons to the Civil Processing Clerk, #5 Summons to The Honorable William P. Barr, United States Attorney General, #6 Form 285 for Summons to Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, #7 Form 285 for Summons to The Civil Processing Clerk, #8 Form 285 for Summons to The Honorable William P. Barr, United States Attorney General) (Lauffer, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bailey v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karen Bailey | |
| Represented By: | Daniel R. Lauffer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
