Whitehurst v. Bryant
Plaintiff: Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst
Defendant: Teresa DeLoatch Bryant
Case Number: 4:2020cv00179
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard E Myers
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including December 11, 2020, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/9/2020. (Waddell, K.)
November 9, 2020 Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #12 Corrected MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Waddell, K.)
November 6, 2020 Filing 12 Corrected MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Teresa DeLoatch Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time) (Banfield, Christina)
November 6, 2020 Filing 11 CORRECTED AND REFILED AT #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Teresa DeLoatch Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer) (Banfield, Christina)
November 6, 2020 Filing 10 Financial Disclosure Statement by Teresa DeLoatch Bryant (Banfield, Christina)
November 6, 2020 Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Christina J. Banfield on behalf of Teresa DeLoatch Bryant. (Banfield, Christina)
November 6, 2020 Notice to Counsel regarding: #9 Notice of Appearance, #10 Financial Disclosure Statement, #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. R. Brittain Blackerby is listed as counsel for Teresa DeLoatch Bryant, but has not filed a notice of appearance with the court to date. All counsel appearing on behalf of a party should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Waddell, K.)
November 6, 2020 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Counsel's motion fails to comply with Local Civil Rule 6.1(a) and the judge's practice preferences as it relates to prior consultation with opposing counsel and the views of opposing counsel within the motion. Counsel is directed to refile the motion making sure to comply with this rule. (Waddell, K.)
October 20, 2020 Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Waddell, K.)
October 15, 2020 Filing 8 Certified Mail Receipt filed by Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst (Waddell, K.)
October 15, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued at Intake as to Teresa DeLoatch Bryant. *NOTICE: Plaintiff is reminded to serve the summons(es) with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4.* (Waddell, K.)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER regarding Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [DE-1] and Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R) [DE-4]. Where Plaintiff has paid the filing fee, see DE-5, the motion at DE-1 is DENIED AS MOOT, and the M&R at DE-4 is TERMINATED AS MOOT. The Complaint has already been filed at DE-6 and the clerk is DIRECTED to issue the summons. Signed by District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 10/15/2020. (Waddell, K.)
October 13, 2020 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Teresa DeLoatch Bryant ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number GRN002614.), filed by Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst. (Waddell, K.)
October 13, 2020 Filing 5 Document: Civil Filing Fee Receipt, filed by Plaintiff. (Waddell, K.)
September 29, 2020 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's application be DENIED and that the clerk be directed to close this case unless Plaintiff pays the requisite filing fee by October 28, 2020. Objections to Memorandum and Recommendations due by 10/12/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 9/28/2020. (Copy of M&R sent to Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst, 2320 A Saddlebock Dr., Winterville, NC 28540 via U.S. Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
September 25, 2020 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst. (Rudd, D.)
September 25, 2020 Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst. (Rudd, D.)
September 25, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.)
September 25, 2020 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Waddell, K.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitehurst v. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teresa DeLoatch Bryant
Represented By: Christina J. Banfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?