Boddie v. Saul
| Juan Boddie |
| Andrew Saul |
| 4:2020cv00204 |
| November 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security on 11/25/2020. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 9 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on William Barr, US Attorney General on 11/23/2020. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 8 USM-285 Form - Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service as to Andrew Saul served on 11/20/2020, answer due 1/19/2021. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 7 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Juan Boddie. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Juan Boddie (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 5 Letter from the Clerk of Court to Plaintiff regarding deficiencies. Sent to Juan Boddie at 1205 Newsome St. Tarboro, NC 27886 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.) |
| Remark: Certified copy of #2 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 4 Summonses Issued as to Andrew Saul and U.S. Attorney. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Juan Boddie. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 11/5/2020. Sent to Juan Boddie at 1205 Newsome St. Tarboro, NC 27886 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.)
|
| Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Sellers, N.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Juan Boddie. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. A party who is proceeding without an attorney shall file a notice of self representation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(b). (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Juan Boddie. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Envelope) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boddie v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Juan Boddie | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
