Warren v. Owens

Warren v. Owens

Petitioner:	Dustin Jamal Warren
Respondent:	Warden Barney Owens
Case Number:	4:2020cv00206
Filed:	October 27, 2020
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
November 2, 2020	Filing 2 ORDER - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above captioned case is reassigned to the Western Division and assigned to the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan for trial and all further proceedings. All future pleadings should reflect the revised case number of: 5:20-HC-2206-FL. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/2/2020. (Indig, A.)
October 27, 2020	Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0417-5693227.), filed by Dustin Jamal Warren. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Record on Appeal in North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket # COA15-499, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Transcripts of Motion Hearing 9-2-2014, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Trial Transcripts (Combined), #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Brief for the Appellant in North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket # COA15-499, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Brief for the State in North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket # COA15-499, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 - Decision in North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket # COA15-499 filed 11-7-2015, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7 - Petition for Discretionary Review in Case # 417P15 filed 12-14-2015, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8 - State's Response to Petition for Discretionary Review in Case # Case # 417P15 filed 12-22-2015, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 10 - Order Denying Petition for Discretionary Review in Case # 417P15 dated 1-28-2016, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 11 - Motion for Appropriate Relief filed 12-12-2016, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - State's Response to Motion for Appropriate Relief filed 9-22-2017, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 13 - Transcripts of Evidentiary Hearing 6-6-2018, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 14 - Transcripts of Evidentiary Hearing 6-11-2020, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 15 - Order Denying Motion for Appropriate Relief dated 7-27-2020, #15 Exhibit Exhibit 16 - Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case # P20-462 filed 8-24-2020, #16 Exhibit Exhibit 17 - State Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case # P20-462 filed 9-3-2020, #17 Exhibit Exhibit 18 - Order Denying Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case # P20-462 filed 9-22-2020) (Megaro, Patrick)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 2, 2020

Filing 2 ORDER - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above captioned case is reassigned to the Western Division and assigned to the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan for trial and all further proceedings. All future pleadings should reflect the revised case number of: 5:20-HC-2206-FL. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/2/2020. (Indig, A.)

October 27, 2020

Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0417-5693227.), filed by Dustin Jamal Warren. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Record on Appeal in North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket # COA15-499, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Transcripts of Motion Hearing 9-2-2014, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Trial Transcripts (Combined), #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Brief for the Appellant in North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket # COA15-499, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Brief for the State in North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket # COA15-499, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 - Decision in North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket # COA15-499 filed 11-7-2015, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7 - Petition for Discretionary Review in Case # 417P15 filed 12-14-2015, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8 - State's Response to Petition for Discretionary Review in Case # Case # 417P15 filed 12-22-2015, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 10 - Order Denying Petition for Discretionary Review in Case # 417P15 dated 1-28-2016, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 11 - Motion for Appropriate Relief filed 12-12-2016, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - State's Response to Motion for Appropriate Relief filed 9-22-2017, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 13 - Transcripts of Evidentiary Hearing 6-6-2018, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 14 - Transcripts of Evidentiary Hearing 6-11-2020, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 15 - Order Denying Motion for Appropriate Relief dated 7-27-2020, #15 Exhibit Exhibit 16 - Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case # P20-462 filed 8-24-2020, #16 Exhibit Exhibit 17 - State Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case # P20-462 filed 9-3-2020, #17 Exhibit Exhibit 18 - Order Denying Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case # P20-462 filed 9-22-2020) (Megaro, Patrick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warren v. Owens
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Barney Owens
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dustin Jamal Warren
Represented By:	Patrick M. Megaro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?