Jackson v. Saul
| Dennis Jackson |
| Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul |
| 4:2020cv00226 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order Redesignating Division to Western Division. The Honorable Richard E. Myers II, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 5:20-CV-658-M. No further filing shall be made in 4:20-CV-226-M. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 12/7/2020. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Western Division; new case number: 5:20-CV-658-M. (Waddell, K.) |
| Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Western division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Dennis Jackson (Scurfield, Scott) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Scott A. Scurfield on behalf of Dennis Jackson. (Scurfield, Scott) |
| Filing 1 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Dennis Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 US Marshals Service, #7 US Marshals Service, #8 US Marshals Service) (Scurfield, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
