The Estate of Daniel D. Coddington v. United States of America et al
| Lisa Marie Coddington and The Estate of Daniel D. Coddington |
| University of Massachusetts Medical School, RN A. Eddins, APRN-CNP Caleb Meyer, RN Susan Gill, Officer Brooks, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Officer Biles |
| 4:2021cv00007 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Order Redesignating Division - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Western Division case. The Honorable James C. Dever III, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents should reflect the new case number of 5:21-CV-28-D. No further filing should be made in 4:21-CV-7-D. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/19/2021. (Sellers, N.)
|
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Complaint. Counsel did not properly identify attachments pursuant to Section V.E. of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Attachments must be clearly labeled (i.e., "Exhibit A (with cover sheet)" is not a sufficient description). Additionally, when filing a document with more than five attachments, the first attachment must be an index of all of the subsequent attached documents. *No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| Intradistrict Transfer to Western Division. New case number 5:21-cv-28-D. (Sellers, N.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" the civil cover sheet and the proposed summonses prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Western division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to The Estate of Daniel D. Coddington. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-5829635), filed by Lisa Marie Coddington. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A (with cover sheet- Letter dated 1/14/2021), #3 Exhibit B (with cover sheet)- Estate Documents from Granville Co. Superior Court, #4 Proposed Summons A. Eddins Summons, #5 Proposed Summons Caleb Meyer Summons, #6 Proposed Summons Officer Biles Summons, #7 Proposed Summons Officer Brooks Summons, #8 Proposed Summons Susan Gill Summons, #9 Proposed Summons UMASS Medical School Summons, #10 Proposed Summons United States of America Summons, #11 Proposed Summons United States of America Summons (2)) (Richardson, Amy) Modified on 1/19/2021 to describe exhibits. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
