Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company v. Carter
| Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company |
| Jerald Walt Carter |
| 4:2021cv00059 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Letter to Pitt County Clerk of Court regarding #13 Order. (Waddell, K.) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Joint Motion to Remand. This action is remanded to the Superior Court of Pitt County, North Carolina for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 5/11/2021. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Remand filed by Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Parrish, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance filed by Michael J. Parrish on behalf of Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company. (Parrish, Michael) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by James Michael Fields on behalf of Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company. (Fields, James) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #12 Joint Motion to Remand. Pursuant to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II Practice Preferences, counsel shall email proposed orders in a word processing format to Documents_Judge_Myers@nced.uscourts.gov. Counsel is directed to email the proposed order in accordance with the Practice Preferences. (Waddell, K.) |
| Motion Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #12 Joint MOTION to Remand. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 9 Memorandum in Support regarding #8 Amended MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jerald Walt Carter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Credit Application (Agreement)) (Cannon, Richard) |
| Filing 8 Amended MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jerald Walt Carter. (Cannon, Richard) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/3/2021. (Copy of order sent to J. Michael Fields of Ward and Smith, P.A. at P. O. Box 8088, Greenville, NC 27835-8088 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.)
|
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #6 Answer to Complaint. Counsel is directed to refile their Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support as separate pleadings. Counsel should first file the Motion to Dismiss pdf using the motion event. Counsel should then file the Memorandum in Support, using the MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT event located under the Responses and Replies category, linking to the Motion to Dismiss when prompted to do so. See Section V.E.1(b) of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint and Motion to Dismiss (12(b)(6) by Jerald Walt Carter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Credit Application (Agreement), #2 Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #3 Unpublished case) (Cannon, Richard) |
| Filing 5 Notice filed by Jerald Walt Carter Notice to State Court 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1446(d). (Attachments: #1 Copy of Notice of Removal) (Cannon, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Notice regarding #1 Notice of Removal and requirement to make a Notice of Appearance sent to Plaintiffs' Counsel, J. Michael Fields of Ward and Smith, P.A. at P. O. Box 8088, Greenville, NC 27835-8088 mailed via US Mail on April 27, 2021. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #2 Notice of Appearance, #3 Financial Disclosure Statement. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerk's office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" (the notice of appearance and the financial disclosure statement) prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. *No further action is necessary. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Jerald Walt Carter (Cannon, Richard) (Main Document 3 flattened and replaced on 4/29/2021) (Edwards, S.). |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Richard L. Cannon, III on behalf of Jerald Walt Carter. (Cannon, Richard) (Main Document 2 flattened and replaced on 4/29/2021) (Edwards, S.). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jerald Walt Carter from Pitt County Superior Court, case number 20-CVS-2505. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6008109), filed by Jerald Walt Carter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Case File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Supplemental Removal Cover Sheet) (Cannon, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company v. Carter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jerald Walt Carter | |
| Represented By: | Richard L. Cannon, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Parrish |
| Represented By: | James Michael Fields |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
