Pope v. First Protective Insurance Company
LYNDA POPE |
First Protective Insurance Company |
4:2021cv00109 |
August 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2022 at 9:30 AM in Wilmington Courtroom 160 before Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II. Trial set for 9/20/2022 at 10:00 AM in Wilmington Courtroom 160 before Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 10/6/2021. Counsel are reminded to read the order in its entirety for other critical information and deadlines. (Waddell, K.) |
Document Referred: #12 Joint Rule 26(f) Report referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II. (Waddell, K.) |
Filing 12 Rule 26(f) Report (joint) filed by Lynda Pope. (Jessup, Robert) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 Answer to Complaint, #8 Memorandum in Support, #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , Answer and Motion to Bifurcate. (Waddell, K.) |
TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Extension of Time #11 . For good cause shown, it is ordered that Plaintiff has up to and including October 27, 2021, within which to respond to the Motion to Dismiss #9 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/27/2021. (Hockaday, A.) |
Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 Answer to Complaint, #8 Memorandum in Support, #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , Answer and Motion to Bifurcate filed by Lynda Pope. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Jessup, Robert) |
Filing 10 ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/17/2021. (Waddell, K.) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , Answer and Motion to Bifurcate filed by First Protective Insurance Company. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #7 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Bifurcate, and Answer. The document should have been filed using a motion event. Counsel is directed to refile the document using the proper motion event. (Waddell, K.) |
Filing 8 Memorandum in Support regarding #7 Answer to Complaint and Motion to Dismiss filed by First Protective Insurance Company. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 REFILED AT #9 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Bifurcate and ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by First Protective Insurance Company. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 Financial Disclosure Statement by Lynda Pope (Jessup, Robert) |
Filing 5 Notice filed by Lynda Pope regarding #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet. (Jessup, Robert) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to First Protective Insurance Company. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Lynda Pope. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Waddell, K.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint - Counsel failed to file a JS44 Civil Cover Sheet as required by the Court. Counsel should file a Cover Sheet using the event "Notice-Other" as soon as possible. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Notice filed by LYNDA POPE regarding #1 Complaint, Proposed changes to Summons. (Jessup, Robert) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Robert Henry Jessup, IV on behalf of LYNDA POPE. (Jessup, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Protective Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6179604.), filed by LYNDA POPE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Policy, #2 Exhibit Appraisal Letter, #3 Exhibit Final Estimate, #4 Exhibit Appraisal Award Form, #5 Exhibit Frontline Insurance Letter, #6 Exhibit Rike Court Order, #7 Exhibit Proof of Loss Statement) (Jessup, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pope v. First Protective Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LYNDA POPE | |
Represented By: | Robert Henry Jessup, IV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: First Protective Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey D. Keister |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.