Willis v. Jones County Board of Elections et al
| Daniel J. Willis |
| Jones County Board of Elections, Zack Koonce, The Town of Trenton, North Carolina, Darlene Spivey, Charles C. Jones, Jr. and Glenn Spivey |
| 4:2021cv00181 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING/REDESINATING CASE. The clerk inadvertently opened this action as a civil action, in violation of the April 4, 2002 prefiling injunction issued by the Court. Accordingly, at the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a miscellaneous case. Case reassigned to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle for all further proceedings. District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan no longer assigned to case. All future documents should reflect the revised case number of 4:21-MC-4-BO. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 12/14/2021. (Rudd, D.)
|
| Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Daniel J. Willis. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to file a new civil action filed by Daniel J. Willis. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Proposed Complaint, #3 Exhibit A- Equal Protection Clause, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
