Boyd v. Wilson
Son Boyd |
Peggy Matthewson Wilson |
4:2022cv00002 |
January 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Real Property: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER - This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Son Boyd's motion for an injunction. This matter is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers for review under 28 U.S.C. 636. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 2/28/2022. Copy sent via US Mail to Son Boyd at 405 E Green St., Robersonville, NC 27871. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 8 MOTION of Continuance and Correction Motion for Immediate Injunction filed by Son Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Injunction (Signed) filed by Son Boyd. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number RAL090229. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #1 MOTION for Injunction filed by Son Boyd. Objections to Memorandum and Recommendations due by 3/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 2/15/2022. Copy sent via US Mail to Son Boyd at 405 E Green St., Robersonville, NC 27871. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Son Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 3 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Son Boyd (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 2 ORDER - Plaintiff is DIRECTED to correct the deficiencies listed above and return the corrected documents within fourteen (14) days from the filing of this order. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 1/13/2022. Copy sent via US Mail to Son Boyd 405 E Green St., Robersonville, NC 27871 with a copy of the pro se complaint package. (Stouch, L.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Son Boyd. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. A party who is proceeding without an attorney shall file a notice of self representation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(b). (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Injunction filed by Son Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Copy of Deed of Trust, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boyd v. Wilson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Son Boyd | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Peggy Matthewson Wilson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.