Terracino et al v. Trimaco, Inc. et al
| Robert Terracino and Bradie Terracino |
| Trimaco, Inc., 2300 Gateway, LLC, Charles Cobaugh and David C May |
| 4:2022cv00003 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Trimaco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Moye, John) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. This docket entry was made in the incorrect case. The motion is being terminated. Counsel is directed to refile the document with a corrected caption in the correct case, 5:22-cv-15-FL. (Castania, M) |
Filing 8
Order - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Western Division case. The Honorable Louise Wood Flanagan, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents should reflect the new case number of 5:22-CV-15-FL. No further filing shall be made in 4:22-CV-3-FL. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/7/2022. (Collins, S.)
|
| Filing 7 Notice filed by Bradie Terracino, Robert Terracino regarding #1 Complaint,, Proposed Summons - Trimaco, Inc. f/k/a 2300 Gateway, Inc.. (Van Arnam, Robert) |
| Filing 6 Notice filed by Bradie Terracino, Robert Terracino regarding #1 Complaint,, Proposed Summons - David C. May. (Van Arnam, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Notice filed by Bradie Terracino, Robert Terracino regarding #1 Complaint,, Proposed Summons - Charles Cobaugh. (Van Arnam, Robert) |
| Filing 4 Notice filed by Bradie Terracino, Robert Terracino regarding #1 Complaint,, Proposed Summons - 2300 Gateway, LLC. (Van Arnam, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew Robert Shores on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Shores, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Robert C. Van Arnam on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Van Arnam, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6384620.), filed by Robert Terracino, Bradie Terracino. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1. U.S. Pat. 9,044,917, #3 Exhibit 2. Patent License Agreement, #4 Exhibit 3. Assignment and Assumption Agreement, #5 Exhibit 4. Feb. 10, 2021 Letter, #6 Exhibit 5. PCT/US2016/060109, #7 Exhibit 6. U.S. Pat. 10,683,607, #8 Exhibit 7. Jan 6, 2022 Opinion Letter) (Van Arnam, Robert) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: [1-1] Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Appearance, #3 Notice of Appearance, #4 Notice - other (proposed summons), #5 Notice - other (proposed summons), #6 Notice - other (proposed summons), #7 Notice - other (proposed summons). Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" (the civil cover sheet, the notices of appearance and the proposed summonses) prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Western division. The Clerk of Court will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
| Intradistrict Transfer to Western Division. New Case Number 5:22-cv-15-FL. (Collins, S.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
