Frazier v. Raleigh Concrete, LLC et al
Clifford Ray Frazier |
Raleigh Concrete, LLC and Fortress Cement, Inc. |
4:2022cv00011 |
February 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Notice of Remand to State Court. Sent to Ken Raper Carteret County Clerk of Superior Court at 300 Court House Square Beaufort, NC 28516 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Remand, Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 3/30/2022. (Sellers, N.) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle regarding #12 Joint MOTION to Remand Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Remand. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 13 Memorandum in Support regarding #12 Joint MOTION to Remand Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Remand filed by Fortress Cement, Inc., Raleigh Concrete, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Settlement and Release Agreement) (Stafford, Thomas) |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Remand Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Remand filed by Fortress Cement, Inc., Raleigh Concrete, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Stafford, Thomas) |
Filing 11 ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/22/2022. (Stouch, L.) |
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 10 Financial Disclosure Statement by Clifford Ray Frazier (Dunn, Raymond) |
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Raymond Earl Dunn, Jr on behalf of Clifford Ray Frazier. (Dunn, Raymond) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Fortress Cement, Inc., Raleigh Concrete, LLC. (Stafford, Thomas) |
Filing 7 Notice filed by Fortress Cement, Inc., Raleigh Concrete, LLC regarding #1 Notice of Removal,, . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice to State Court of Filing of Notice of Removal) (Stafford, Thomas) |
Filing 6 Notice regarding #1 Notice of Removal and requirement to make a Notice of Appearance sent to Plaintiffs' Counsel, Raymond E. Dunn, Jr. & Charles J. Cushman of Dunn Pittman Skinner & Cushman, PLLC, 3230 Country Club Road, PO Drawer 1389, New Bern, NC 28562 mailed via US Mail on February 16, 2022. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Brian Novak McCracken on behalf of Fortress Cement, Inc., Raleigh Concrete, LLC. (McCracken, Brian) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Raleigh Concrete, LLC (Stafford, Thomas) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Fortress Cement, Inc. (Stafford, Thomas) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Thomas Cullen Stafford on behalf of Fortress Cement, Inc., Raleigh Concrete, LLC. (Stafford, Thomas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Fortress Cement, Inc., Raleigh Concrete, LLC from Carteret County, Superior Court, case number 22-cvs-51. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6432345), filed by Fortress Cement, Inc., Raleigh Concrete, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Removal Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - Summonses to Defendants, #4 Exhibit B - Complaint, #5 Exhibit C - Cover Letter, #6 Exhibit D - Acceptances of Service for Defendants, #7 Exhibit E - Notice to State Court of Filing of Notice of Removal) (Stafford, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.