Messier v. SDS Restaurant Group, LLC
Plaintiff: Betty Messier
Defendant: SDS Restaurant Group, LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv00068
Filed: June 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard E Myers
Referring Judge: Kimberly A Swank
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2022 Filing 10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Betty Messier as to SDS RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC. (Conlon, Nicholas)
August 10, 2022 SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND NOTICE TO COUNSEL regarding #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer: (1) failure to file a financial disclosure statement as to SDS Restaurant Group, LLC; (2) all counsel appearing on behalf of a party shall file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a); and (3) failure to file a proposed order. Counsel is directed to review the entirety of the previously entered notices of August 2, 2022 and correct the named deficiencies. (Waddell, K.)
August 2, 2022 Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Complaint filed by SDS Restaurant Group, LLC. (Stephenson, Jeremy)
August 2, 2022 Filing 8 Notice Directing Plaintiff to Proceed after Defendant's Failure to Answer. (Waddell, K.)
August 2, 2022 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to SDS Restaurant Group, LLC. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Waddell, K.)
August 2, 2022 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(b)(3) and Section V(I)(3) of the CM/ECF Policy and Procedures Manual, parties must file a proposed order with any non-dispositive motion. Please file the proposed order using the 'Proposed Order' event in the Responses and Replies category and link it back to the motion to which it corresponds. Additionally, pursuant to the Practice Preferences of Chief Judge Myers, counsel shall also email proposed orders in a word processing format to Documents_Judge_Myers@nced.uscourts.gov. (Waddell, K.)
August 2, 2022 Notice to Counsel regarding: #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. All counsel appearing on behalf of a party shall file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Waddell, K.)
July 26, 2022 Filing 7 Affidavit of Service for Summons, Civil Cover Sheet, Complaint and exhibits filed by Betty Messier served on SDS Restaurant Group, LLC on 07/08/2022. (Kinsley, Brian)
July 11, 2022 Filing 6 Notice filed by Betty Messier of Filing Consent-to-Join Form. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent-to-Join Form) (Conlon, Nicholas)
June 29, 2022 Filing 5 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Nicholas R. Conlon on behalf of Betty Messier. (Conlon, Nicholas)
June 28, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to SDS Restaurant Group, LLC. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.)
June 28, 2022 Notice to Counsel regarding: [1-3] Proposed Summons. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" (the proposed summons) prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.)
June 28, 2022 Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. (Waddell, K.)
June 28, 2022 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank added. (Rudd, D.)
June 27, 2022 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Betty Messier (Kinsley, Brian)
June 27, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Brian L. Kinsley on behalf of Betty Messier. (Kinsley, Brian)
June 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SDS Restaurant Group, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6613546.), filed by Betty Messier. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet for case, #2 Exhibit Consent to Sue Form, #3 Proposed Summons to SDS Restaurant Group, LLC) (Kinsley, Brian) (Attachment 3 flattened and replaced on 6/28/2022) (Edwards, S.).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Messier v. SDS Restaurant Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Messier
Represented By: Brian L. Kinsley
Represented By: Nicholas R. Conlon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SDS Restaurant Group, LLC
Represented By: Jeremy A. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?