Alston v. Dejoy
| Latoshia D. Alston |
| Postmaster General Louis Dejoy and Louis Dejoy |
| 4:2022cv00111 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Brian S Meyers |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint filed by Latoshia D. Alston served on US Attorney General - Raleigh N.C. on 09/26/2022. (Bryant, Ralph) |
| Filing 6 Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint filed by Latoshia D. Alston served on US Attorney General - Washington D.C. on 09/28/2022. (Bryant, Ralph) |
| Filing 5 Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint filed by Latoshia D. Alston served on Louis DeJoy on 09/29/2022. (Bryant, Ralph) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Louis Dejoy, Attorney General, US Attorney. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Latoshia D. Alston (Bryant, Ralph) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Ralph T. Bryant, Jr on behalf of Latoshia D. Alston. (Bryant, Ralph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Louis Dejoy ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-6728989.), filed by Latoshia D. Alston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Bryant, Ralph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
