Olivera v. McCoy et al
| Miguel Olivera |
| Michael McCoy and SPP Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00121 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Robert T Numbers |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Western Division. New Case No.: 5:22-CV-414-M-RN. (McNally, Kimberly) |
Filing 4
Order Redesignating Division to Western Division. The Honorable Richard E. Myers II, Chief United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 5:22-CV-414-M-RN. No further filing shall be made in 4:22-CV-121-M-RN. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/11/2022. (McNally, Kimberly)
|
| Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Western division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Miguel Olivera (Hormozdi, Shireen) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Shireen Hormozdi on behalf of Miguel Olivera. (Hormozdi, Shireen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael McCoy, SPP Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BNCEDC-6766686.), filed by Miguel Olivera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (Hormozdi, Shireen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
