Mason v. Carteret County, North Carolina et al
| Lesley Mason |
| Carteret County, North Carolina, Tommy R Burns, II and Eugene Foxworth |
| 4:2022cv00130 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Memorandum in Support regarding #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Tommy R Burns, II, Carteret County, North Carolina, Eugene Foxworth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Carteret County Personnel Policy) (Adams, Mary) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Tommy R Burns, II, Carteret County, North Carolina, Eugene Foxworth. (Adams, Mary) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lesley Mason. (Austin, William) Modified on 11/21/2022 (Collins, S.). |
| Filing 10 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Lesley Mason. Eugene Foxworth waiver sent on 10/26/2022, answer due 12/25/2022. (Austin, William) |
| Filing 9 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Lesley Mason. Tommy R Burns, II waiver sent on 10/26/2022, answer due 12/25/2022. (Austin, William) |
| Filing 8 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Lesley Mason. Carteret County, North Carolina waiver sent on 10/26/2022, answer due 12/25/2022. (Austin, William) |
| Filing 7 Summons Reissued as to Tommy R Burns, II, Carteret County, North Carolina, Eugene Foxworth. *NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summonses and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4.* (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 6 Notice filed by Lesley Mason . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Burns, #2 Proposed Summons Foxworth) (Austin, William) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Tommy R Burns, II, Carteret County, North Carolina, Eugene Foxworth. *NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summonses and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4.* (Collins, S.) |
| Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Collins, S.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #3 Motion for Disclosure. Counsel incorrectly selected a motion event to file in the financial disclosure statement at #3 . The deputy clerk corrected the docket text and terminated the entry as a motion. Nofurther action by counsel required. (Collins, S.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #2 Notice of Appearance, #4 Financial Disclosure Statement. Counsel is reminded that following the filing of the initiating document, all pleadings should contain the case number and division. No action necessary at this time. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Lesley Mason (Austin, William) |
| Filing 3 **CORRECTED AND REFILED AT #4 ** MOTION for Disclosure filed by Lesley Mason. (Austin, William) Modified on 10/25/2022 (Collins, S.). |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by William Joseph Austin, Jr on behalf of Lesley Mason. (Austin, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-6791378.), filed by Lesley Mason. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Carteret County, NC, #3 Proposed Summons Burns, #4 Proposed Summons Foxworth) (Austin, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
