Partain v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. See 7:23-cv-110-BO-RJ.
Michael Sean Partain |
United States of America |
4:2023cv00029 |
February 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Robert B Jones |
Other Statutory Actions |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Order Redesignating Division - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Southern Division case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 7:23-CV-110-BO-RJ. No further filing shall be made in 4:23-CV-29-BO-RJ. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/13/2023. (Sellers, N.) |
Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Sellers, N.) |
Intradistrict Transfer to Southern Division. New case number - 7:23-cv-110-BO-RJ. (Sellers, N.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Michael Sean Partain. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Sellers, N.) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL - All counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Sellers, N.) |
Notice to Counsel regarding: [1-1] Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or "flatten" the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" the document prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 3 Notice filed by Michael Sean Partain regarding #1 Complaint Summons to USAG. (Henson, Thomas) |
Filing 2 Notice filed by Michael Sean Partain regarding #1 Complaint Summons to NCED. (Henson, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BNCEDC-6940038.), filed by Michael Sean Partain. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Henson, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Partain v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. See 7:23-cv-110-BO-RJ. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Sean Partain | |
Represented By: | Thomas W. Henson, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.