Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
| Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company |
| Pallet Rack Surplus, Inc. and Ramon Rodriguez |
| 4:2023cv00065 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Robert T Numbers |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Pallet Rack Surplus, Inc., Ramon Rodriguez. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Crum & Forster Holdings Corp., Corporate Parent FFHL Group Ltd, Corporate Parent United States Fire Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Fairfax (US) Inc., Corporate Parent Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited for Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company. (Brown, David) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by David L. Brown on behalf of Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company. (Brown, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7031295.), filed by Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Underlying Action, #2 Exhibit 2 - Subcontract, #3 Exhibit 3 - Policy, #4 Cover Sheet, #5 Summons - Pallet Rack Surplus, Inc., #6 Summons - Ramon Rodriguez) (Brown, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
