Gayring v. United States of America et al
| Shelly Gayring |
| United States of America and Maddox Investments, LLC |
| 4:2023cv00131 |
| August 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Robert B Jones |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint, filed by Maddox Investments, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead) (Wall, F.) |
| Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Stouch, L.) |
| TEXT ORDER granting Defendant Maddox Investments, LLC's Motion for Extension of Time #9 . For good cause shown, it is ordered that this defendant has up to and including October 30, 2023, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/28/2023. (Hockaday, A.) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Georgia Hezain Malik on behalf of Maddox Investments, LLC. (Malik, Georgia) |
| Filing 7 Financial Disclosure Statement by Maddox Investments, LLC (Wall, F.) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by F. Marshall Wall on behalf of Maddox Investments, LLC. (Wall, F.) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Maddox Investments, LLC, United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Stouch, L.) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Shelly Gayring (Miller, W.) |
| Filing 3 Notice filed by Shelly Gayring regarding #1 Complaint, Appearance of Counsel. (Miller, W.) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 500005393.), filed by Shelly Gayring. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Civil Process Clerk, #2 Proposed Summons AG Garland) (Miller, W.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. Filing is not text searchable. Local Civil Rule 5.1 requires that all documents submitted for filing be in a text searchable format. (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Shelly Gayring. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: [1-2] Proposed Summons, [1-3] Proposed Summons. When the defendant is a government agency or employee, summonses are required for the agency or employee, the U.S. Attorney General, and the U.S. Attorney Civil Process Clerk. Counsel should file a proposed summons for the U.S. Attorney Civil Process Clerk and the U.S. Attorney General using the event "Notice-Other". (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 500005393.), filed by Shelly Gayring. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Maddox Investments, LLC, #3 Proposed Summons U.S.A.) (Miller, W.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
