Mu et al v. Jaddou et al
Cong Mu and Ke Yang |
Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and U. S. Department of Citizenship and Immigration Services |
4:2023cv00148 |
September 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Robert T Numbers |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order Redesignating Division to Southern Division - This case is redesignated as a Southern Division case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 7:23-CV-1282-BO-RN. No further filing shall be made in 4:23-CV-148-BO. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/19/2023. (Stouch, L.) |
Intradistrict Transfer to Southern Division. New case number: 7:23-CV-1282-BO-RN. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 5 Notice filed by Cong Mu Writ of Mandamus. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons US Attorney Summons) (Buda, John) |
Filing 4 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by John B Buda on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Buda, John) |
Notice to Counsel regarding: [1-1] Proposed Summons, [1-2] Proposed Summons, [1-3] Proposed Summons, [1-4] Financial Disclosure Statement, [1-5] Financial Disclosure Statement, [1-6] Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" (the proposed summonses, the financial disclosure statements, civil cover sheet) prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correct the error. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Complaint. When the defendant is a government agency or employee, summonses are required for the agency or employee, the U.S. Attorney General, and the U.S. Attorney Civil Process Clerk. Counsel should file a proposed summons for the U.S. Attorney Civil Process Clerk and the U.S. Attorney General using the event "Notice-Other". (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding [1-7] Notice of Special Appearance. The notice of special attorney appearance is a stand alone document. Counsel is directed to refile using the event "Notices - Notice of Special Appearance". (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding [1-4] Financial Disclosure Statement, [1-5] Financial Disclosure Statement. The Financial Disclosure statement is astand alone document therefore Counsel is directed to refile the Financial Disclosure Statement using the event "Other-Documents - Financial Disclosure Statement". (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7270185.), filed by Cong Mu. (Buda, John) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Thomas E. Fulghum on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Fulghum, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7270185.), filed by Cong Mu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USCIS Summons, #2 Exhibit Alejando Mayorkas Summons, #3 Exhibit Ur M Jaddou Summons, #4 Exhibit Ke Yang Financial Disclosure, #5 Exhibit Cong Mu Financial Disclosure, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Exhibit Notice of Special Appearance John Buda, #8 Exhibit Notice of Appearance Tom) (Buda, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.