Martin County v. AGC Chemical Americas, Inc. et al
| Martin County |
| AGC Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, AGC Chemical Americas, Inc., Asahi Glass Co., Archroma Management LLC, Archroma U.S., Inc., Arkema, Inc., BASF Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Carrier Global Corporation, Chemdesign Products, Inc., Chemguard, Inc., Chemicals Incorporated, Chubb Fire, Ltd., Clariant Corporation, Deepwater Chemicals, Inc., John Doe Defendants 1-49, Dynax Corporation, Kidde PLC, Inc., Nation Ford Chemical Company, National Foam, Inc., United Technologies Corporation, Tyco Fire Products LP and UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv00211 |
| December 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Brian S Meyers |
| Richard E Myers |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER regarding MDL No. 2873. Signed by Tiffaney D. Pete, Clerk of the Panel on 1/19/2024. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Case transferred to District of South Carolina. File transmitted electronically. (McNally, Kimberly) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The court DIRECTS counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendants to file a joint statusreport providing the respective position(s) of the parties regarding deadlines in this matter no later than February 23, 2024, if, by that date, the JPML has not yet determined whether this case is suited for inclusion in the AFFF MDL. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers on 1/18/2024. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for other critical information and deadlines. (McNally, Kimberly)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Plaintiff regarding #1 Notice of Removal. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers regarding #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Notice of Removal. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. At the direction of the Court, this Case is reassigned to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for all further proceedings. District Judge James C. Dever, III is no longer assigned to case All future filings shall reflect the revised case number of 4:23-CV-211-M. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/5/2024. (Moore, P.) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Blake, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Chemguard, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Johnson Control International plc for Chemguard, Inc.. (Blake, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Tyco Fire Products LP identifying Corporate Parent Johnson Control International plc for Tyco Fire Products LP. (Blake, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Christopher J. Blake on behalf of Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (Blake, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP from Martin County Superior Court, case number 23-CVS-277. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCEDC-7407997), filed by Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet - EDNC Supplemental Removal Cover Sheet) (Blake, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
