Graham v. O'Malley **
| Crystal Graham |
| Martin O'Malley |
| SSA-Office of General Counsel |
| 4:2024cv00011 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Southern Division case. The Honorable Louise Wood Flanagan, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 7:24-CV-20-FL. No further filing shall be made in 4:24-CV-11-FL. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/19/2024. (Collins, S)
|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Southern Division. New Case Number 7:24-cv-20-FL. (Collins, S) |
| Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Crystal Graham (O'Brien, Cheryl) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Cheryl A. O'Brien on behalf of Crystal Graham. (O'Brien, Cheryl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Crystal Graham. (O'Brien, Cheryl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Crystal Graham, filed by Crystal Graham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (O'Brien, Cheryl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
