King v. Reed et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE NO. 5:24-CV-697-D-RJ.
| KEENE DABREO and M. BRYAN KING |
| HALLY EXPRESS INC. and BERNARD T. REED, JR. |
| 4:2024cv00174 |
| December 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Angela Farag Craddock on behalf of All Defendants. (Craddock, Angela) |
| Filing 5 Financial Disclosure Statement by HALLY EXPRESS INC. (Webster, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by BERNARD T. REED, JR (Webster, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Notice filed by BERNARD T. REED, JR, HALLY EXPRESS INC. regarding #1 Notice of Removal, SUPPLEMENTAL REMOVAL COVER SHEET. (Webster, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew D. Webster on behalf of All Defendants. (Webster, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from WAKE SUPERIOR COURT, case number 24CV033898-910. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCEDC-7877323), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A - SUMMONS, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B - COMPLAINT, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT C - ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT D - NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT E - NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL, #6 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET) (Webster, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
