Coggins v. London Metropolitan Police Service (United Kingdom)
Plaintiff: Kesha Coggins
Defendant: London Metropolitan Police Service (United Kingdom)
Case Number: 5:2007cv00163
Filed: May 4, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: GRANVILLE
Presiding Judge: James C. Fox
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kesha Coggins. Signed by Judge James Gates on 5/16/2007. CC:plaintiff via regular mail.(Deputy Clerk - SE, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coggins v. London Metropolitan Police Service (United Kingdom)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kesha Coggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: London Metropolitan Police Service (United Kingdom)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?