Coggins v. London Metropolitan Police Service (United Kingdom)
Kesha Coggins |
London Metropolitan Police Service (United Kingdom) |
5:2007cv00163 |
May 4, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
GRANVILLE |
James C. Fox |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kesha Coggins. Signed by Judge James Gates on 5/16/2007. CC:plaintiff via regular mail.(Deputy Clerk - SE, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Coggins v. London Metropolitan Police Service (United Kingdom) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kesha Coggins | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: London Metropolitan Police Service (United Kingdom) | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.