Black v. New Jersey Government et al
| John D. Black |
| New Jersey Government, City of Newark, Ronald Rice, Homedepore, NJ, Andte Sigmone, Luis Properties LLC, N.J. Motor Vehicle Service Commission, James Sharp and Cory Booker |
| 5:2008cv00193 |
| April 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Torts to Land Office |
| WAKE |
| James C. Fox |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER denying 99 Motion to Make Known and denying 100 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to dispense with taking any new materials into the record of this case. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 2/29/2012. Copy mailed to the plaintiff via regular mail. (Edwards, S.)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER denying 88 Motion to Certify the Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 3/31/2011. Copy to plaintiff via regular mail. (Edwards, S.)
|
|
Filing
48
JUDGMENT in favor of City of Newark, Homedepore, NJ, Luis Properties LLC, N.J. Motor Vehicle Service Commission, New Jersey Government, Andte Sigmone, Cory Booker, James Sharp, Ronald Rice against John D. Black. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the De fendants Motions to Dismiss are ALLOWED and this action is DISMISSED. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Dennis Iavarone, Clerk of Court Susan Edwards, Deputy on 3/4/2009. CC:counsel via e-mail and via plaintiff via regular mail. (Edwards, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
