Parrish v. Johnston Community College et al
Paula Parrish |
Dr. Donald L. Reichard, Donald H. Johnson, George Howard Jones and Johnston Community College |
5:2009cv00022 |
January 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
JOHNSTON |
Malcolm J. Howard |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:451 Employment Discrimination |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 JUDGMENT in favor of George Howard Jones against Paula Parrish. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court on 3/21/2011. (Heath, D.) |
Filing 66 ORDER granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 58 Motion to Exceed Page Limitation. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Johnston Community College, Dr. Donald Reichard, and Donald H. Johnson are dismissed. Remaining before the court are plaintiff's claims against defendant George Harold Jones in his individual capacity. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 1/25/2011. (Heath, D.) |
Filing 56 ORDER granting 51 Motion. This matter is before the court on plaintiff's motion to submit evidence on CD. The court grants plaintiff's motion to file [DE #51] and directs the clerk to file plaintiff's motion and the CD into the dock et as a Notice of Filing with the photo images attached as an exhibit. Furthermore, due to the graphic nature of some of the images on the CD, thecourt, on its own motion, directs the clerk to place the exhibits under SEAL. Copy forwarded to plaintiff via First Class Mail. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 7/15/2010. (Heath, D.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.