Dalenko v. Aldridge
| 5:2009cv00117 |
| March 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| James C. Fox |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT; IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendants Protective Motion for Extension of Time is ALLOWED, and the Defendants Protective Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss the Complaint is deemed timely filed. Moreover, Defendants Protective Motion is ALLOWED, Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to file Supplemental Complaint is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Dennis Iavarone, Clerk of Court By Susan Edwards, Deputy on 12/3/2009. Copies served. (Edwards, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dalenko v. Aldridge | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
