Yelverton v. Yelverton Farms Ltd. et al
| Stephen Thomas Yelverton |
| Yelverton Farms Ltd., Phyllis Edmundson, Charles Edmundson and Deborah Marm |
| 5:2009cv00331 |
| July 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAYNE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
ORDER denying 171 Motion for Joinder, Motion for Hearing, Motion to Reopen Case - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/16/2016. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER - This matter comes before the court upon request by Defendants' counsel to stay the court's disposition of pending motions. After review of the letter of Defendants' counsel and for good cause shown therein, this court stays th e proceedings in this case, including all upcoming case deadlines, and holds in abeyance ruling on Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 40 and the supplement thereto 86 , Plaintiff's motion to strike 61 and Defendant's motion t o dismiss 79 . To ensure the parties' focus on a possible settlement, the parties shall not file any further motions or other documents in this case. Within ten (10) days of the conclusion of negotiations with the Chapter 7 Trustee, the parties shall advise the court as to the status of the case, at which time if needed the court will reset case deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/09/2010. Copies served. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
