Benjamin v. Iman et al
| Christopher Benjamin |
| Dale Iman, Doug Hewitt, Terrie Hutaff, Greg Schaefer, Gerald Dietzen, Ernest Love, Willie McDonald, Stanley Sadler and Steven Bullard |
| 5:2009cv00553 |
| December 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| CUMBERLAND |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT - Where all defendants have been dismissed from this action or have had summary judgment granted in their favor, judgment hereby enters against plaintiff, who shall have and recover nothing from this action. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court on 05/24/2011. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 34 Motion for Reconsideration and granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/17/2011. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER adopting 2 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Title VII claims are DISMISSED as to the individual defendants, but plaintiff may proceed on his Title VII claim against the City of Fayetteville and his other state and federal claims. The EEOC is not party to this action, nor is any individual employee thereof. Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/15/2010. Copies served. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
