Greystone Bank v. Return: United Fund for the Education of Russian Immigrant Children in Israel, Inc. et al
| Greystone Bank |
| Return: United Fund for the Education of Russian Immigrant Children in Israel, Inc., George Rieder, Joseph Hoch, Aviva Hoch and Morris Fuchs |
| 5:2010cv00044 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Transfer Case and denying 17 Motion to Dismiss. It is ORDERED that the action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Clerk is DIRECTED to effectuate the transfer forthwith. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/16/2010. Copies served electronically. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS - All proceedings in this case are STAYED, and all pending deadlines are thereby extended, for a period of 14 days from June 7, 2010. During the stay period, the parties shall meet in person to conduct a settlement conferenc e in an effort to resolve this matter. The parties shall report back to the Court at the conclusion of the stay period, or sooner if the outcome of the settlement conference warrants. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/09/2010. Copies served electronically. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
