ANTRANICK v. RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE, INTERNATIONAL et al
Plaintiff: JALAL ASKANDER ANTRANICK
Defendant: UNITY RESOURCES GROUP, L.L.C. and Research Triangle Institute International
Case Number: 5:2010cv00073
Filed: February 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: xxU.S. Outside District
Presiding Judge: James C. Dever
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 63 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the court GRANTS RTI's and Unity's motions to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction [D.E. 49, 55, 41, 48] and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. The court also DISMISSES Unity's motion for a protective order [D.E. 57] and all other pending motions [D.E. 15, 11, 13] as MOOT. Signed by Dennis P. Iavaroane, Clerk of Court by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk on 8/12/2010. Copies served. (Sawyer, D.)
February 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting in part and denying in part (14) Defendant RTI's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint or Alternatively, Motion for Definite Statement and to Transfer Any Remaining Claims in case 08-cv-00096; denying in part and reserving in part ( 15)Defendant Unity's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint 1:08-cv-00096-JDS; granting in part and denying in part (11) Defendant RTI's Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Motion to Transfer Any Remaining Claims in case 1:08-cv-0595; reser ving ruling on (13) Defendant Unity's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pending additional jurisdicional discovery in case 1:08-cv-00595-JDS;denying all remaining claims in 08-cv-0096 and 08-cv-595 contained in Defendants RTI a nd Unity's Motions that are not discussed in this Memorandum Order; directing the Clerk of the Court to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Signed on 2/5/10 by Judge Jack D. Shanstrom, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. (jeb, ) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 3/1/2010.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANTRANICK v. RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE, INTERNATIONAL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITY RESOURCES GROUP, L.L.C.
Represented By: Kevin J. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Research Triangle Institute International
Represented By: Mark Alan Ash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JALAL ASKANDER ANTRANICK
Represented By: Eric W. Bloom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?