Paul v. Lay
Peter Paul |
Kenneth R. Lay |
5:2010cv00100 |
March 16, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
James C. Fox |
Other Statutory Actions |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 JUDGMENT; IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED and the Amended Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED. Consequently this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending motion is DENIED as moot. Signed by Dennis Iavarone, Clerk of Court by Susan Edwards, Deputy on 6/24/2010. CC:pro se plaintiff via regular mail and counsel via e-mail. (Edwards, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Paul v. Lay | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Peter Paul | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kenneth R. Lay | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.